EPO Guidelines 2022 – Minimal update re amendment of description

The 2022 EPO Guidelines have been released and have been updated, albeit in a very limited way, to soften slightly the EPO’s position on the requirements surrounding amendment of the description.

Section F-IV, 4.3 of the Guidelines, which refers to description amendments, has been extensively re written, but the substance of the guidelines has not changed.  It is still a requirement of the Guidelines that “there must not be inconsistency between the claims and the description. Parts of the description that give the skilled person the impression that they disclose ways to carry out the invention but are not encompassed by the wording of the claims are inconsistent (or contradictory) with the claims”.  This will continue to require potentially significant revision of the description during prosecution, especially if the claims have been revised. 

The EPO have stated that certain embodiments which are not covered by the claims can remain as long as a specific statement identifying those embodiments, such as "Embodiments X and Y are not encompassed by the wording of the claims but are considered as useful for understanding the invention", is included.  General statements that do not indicate specific subject matter will now be permitted.

There is, however, a slight relaxation in that “for borderline cases where there is doubt as to whether an embodiment is consistent with the claims, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the applicant” – whether this will in practice result in any lessening of the requirements, only time will tell.

Thus, the changes to the Guidelines will likely have little impact on the increasingly onerous requirement to ensure that the description is updated – if an applicant disagrees with the EPO’s requirements on this aspect of prosecution, then they will need to try to rely on the recent decision in T1989/18 (see here).

If you would like to discuss the content of this article further, then please contact Tony Smee or your usual Slingsby Partners representative.

Contact

Tony Smee

tony.smee@slingsbypartners.com

News & insights

New Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) expected concerning the approach to claim interpretation

The long running saga of if, how and when the description can or should be used to interpret the claims of an EP patent may well be coming to a close.

Read more

Slingsby Partners attends a networking event at the University of Bath Law Society

Slingsby Partners has been a sponsor of the University of Bath Law Society for the last three years. As part of this sponsorship arrangement, we attended a networking event hosted by the Society on 19 March 2024. Ollie, Verity and Charlotte attended, along with representatives from other law firms and law schools – Allen & Overy, Stone King and The College of Legal Practice.

Read more

EPO to increase official fees from 1 April 2024

The European Patent Office (EPO) has announced in the January issue of the EPO Journal that the official fee schedule for European patents will be revised from 1 April 2024, resulting in an increase of roughly 4% on most fees. Full details of the fees can be found here: Official Journal, 2024 (epo.org)

Read more