English Courts continue to exercise jurisdiction over global FRAND cases

In August 2020 the Supreme Court affirmed the UK courts’ jurisdiction to determine global FRAND licences in Standard Essential Patent cases (Unwired Planet v Huawei, and Conversant v Huawei & ZTE). The Supreme Court did not claim that that jurisdiction was an exclusive one. Subsequently several defendants to UK infringement actions have begun proceedings in other countries, filing applications to stay the UK proceedings while the FRAND issues are determined elsewhere. The High Court has recently denied applications to stay in two such cases: Nokia Technologies OY & Anor v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd & Ors and Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Xiaomi Inc & Ors.

In Koninklijke Philips v Xiaomi, Mr Justice Mellor determined that Xiaomi did not have a jurisdiction challenge under CPR Part 11. In Nokia Technologies OY v OnePlus Technology, Judge Hacon determined that the English courts had jurisdiction despite the existence of an alternative forum – Chongqinq Court in China – that was prepared to settle a global licence between the parties. The judge ruled that the dispute in Nokia Technologies OY v OnePlus Technology is characterised in the same way as in Conversant – namely essentiality, infringement and validity of a UK patent – and these issues would not be considered by the Chongqinq Court (irrespective of the overlap in the disputes before the English and Chinese courts as to what constitute FRAND terms for a licence under Nokia’s patents). As Judge Hacon commented, the current unevolved framework for the settlement of a global licence is unsatisfactory, but until an internationally recognised tribunal or alternative mechanism for settling global licences is agreed, national courts must deal with circumstances as they are.

News & insights

Updates to UKIPO AI Guidelines - 30 January 2025

The UKIPO have once again updated their guidance for examining patent applications relating to AI inventions following the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents [2024] EW

Read more

Emma Norris joins CIPA Committee

We are pleased to announce one of our Senior IP Paralegals has been elected to join the CIPA Paralegal Committee. Emma Norris was elected in January 2025 and will serve a 3 year term. The Committee delivers training and education for patent paralegals and is vital in continuing to promote the Patent Paralegals profession on behalf of CIPA.

Read more

Emotional Perception heads to the Supreme Court

Emotional Perception have been granted permission to appeal the recent Court of Appeal decision to the UK Supreme Court, in the latest development to the Emotional Perception vs Comptroller-General of Patents case. 

Read more